<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>blog.world3.net &#187; politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.world3.net/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.world3.net</link>
	<description>たとえ溺れても梦はゆめでしかない</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 23:06:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Same old Tory party, what happened to the LibDems?</title>
		<link>http://blog.world3.net/2010/06/same-old-tory-party-what-happened-to-the-libdems/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.world3.net/2010/06/same-old-tory-party-what-happened-to-the-libdems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mojo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.world3.net/2010/06/same-old-tory-party-what-happened-to-the-libdems/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Selling off rail track built with £5bn of public money for a mere £1.5bn. Remove waiting time limits from the NHS, thus driving people to go private. Same old, same old. This coalition is a joke.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Selling off rail track built with £5bn of public money for a mere £1.5bn. Remove waiting time limits from the NHS, thus driving people to go private.</p>
<p>Same old, same old. This coalition is a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.world3.net/2010/06/same-old-tory-party-what-happened-to-the-libdems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8230; and so it begins</title>
		<link>http://blog.world3.net/2010/06/and-so-it-begins/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.world3.net/2010/06/and-so-it-begins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 21:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mojo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.world3.net/2010/06/and-so-it-begins/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Massive public service cuts and farming jobs out to private companies. Tell me again Mr Cameron, Mr Osborne, how is this different to the 1980s? Actaully, to be fair, it is different. It&#8217;s worse. Cuts are inevitable, but doing so much so soon will cause a double dip recession. Getting rid of government jobs and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Massive public service cuts and farming jobs out to private companies. Tell me again Mr Cameron, Mr Osborne, how is this different to the 1980s?</p>
<p>Actaully, to be fair, it is different. It&#8217;s worse.</p>
<p>Cuts are inevitable, but doing so much so soon will cause a double dip recession. Getting rid of government jobs and replacing them with private ones costs more, puts people out of work and on to benefits, and you end up with poorer services.</p>
<p>There is a responsible way to do this and then there is the Tory way. As usual they look out for the rich, make money for private companies with lucrative government contracts and screw everyone else.</p>
<p>Dave was right, this is going to hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.world3.net/2010/06/and-so-it-begins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BNP back at it again, time to start a Facebook group?</title>
		<link>http://blog.world3.net/2009/12/bnp-back-at-it-again-time-to-start-a-facebook-group/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.world3.net/2009/12/bnp-back-at-it-again-time-to-start-a-facebook-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mojo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.world3.net/?p=228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like they have started again: http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?sortBy=2&#38;forumID=7365&#38;edition=1&#38;ttl=20091222190905&#38;#paginator With the recent success of Rage Against The Machine thanks to a Facebook group I&#8217;m starting to think it might be a good way to sort this out. Unfortunately Facebook&#8217;s privacy policies go against my nature but maybe this time needs must&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like they have started again: <a href="http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?sortBy=2&amp;forumID=7365&amp;edition=1&amp;ttl=20091222190905&amp;#paginator">http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?sortBy=2&amp;forumID=7365&amp;edition=1&amp;ttl=20091222190905&amp;#paginator</a></p>
<p>With the recent success of Rage Against The Machine thanks to a Facebook group I&#8217;m starting to think it might be a good way to sort this out. Unfortunately Facebook&#8217;s privacy policies go against my nature but maybe this time needs must&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.world3.net/2009/12/bnp-back-at-it-again-time-to-start-a-facebook-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No more Wikipedia editing</title>
		<link>http://blog.world3.net/2009/12/no-more-wikipedia-editing/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.world3.net/2009/12/no-more-wikipedia-editing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mojo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.world3.net/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have decided to give up editing Wikipedia. Stupidity, American-centric ideas and the ability of people with too much time on their hands to enforce their personal preferences has not only driven a lot of good editors away, but it has also done a lot of damage to the content too. If you compare the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have decided to give up editing Wikipedia.</p>
<p>Stupidity, American-centric ideas and the ability of people with too much time on their hands to enforce their personal preferences has not only driven a lot of good editors away, but it has also done a lot of damage to the content too.</p>
<p>If you compare the Japanese version to the English one the contrasting work together/I&#8217;m always right attitudes, as well as numerous other flaws, become obvious. I&#8217;m not going to waste my time any more.</p>
<p>Well, except perhaps on keeping the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PC_World_%28retailer%29">PC World</a> article full of my own opinions. I never said I wasn&#8217;t as bad as the rest of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.world3.net/2009/12/no-more-wikipedia-editing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Halfwit racists</title>
		<link>http://blog.world3.net/2009/11/halfwit-racists/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.world3.net/2009/11/halfwit-racists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mojo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.world3.net/?p=220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t know why I keep reading the BBC Have Your Say forums. I fear I may be turning into a Daily Mail reader, hooked on that feeling or moral outrage. Anyway&#8230; No. There are millions of pictures of non-black people being ridiculed (i.e. George Bush, Tony Blair, Bunker Brown, Nick Griffin, Wayne Rooney etc, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why I keep reading the BBC Have Your Say forums. I fear I may be turning into a Daily Mail reader, hooked on that feeling or moral outrage.</p>
<p>Anyway&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>No. There are millions of pictures of non-black people being ridiculed (i.e. George Bush, Tony Blair, Bunker Brown, Nick Griffin, Wayne Rooney etc, etc), should these be removed as well? This has only come about because the 1st lady is black, if she’d been white, this would not have made the news.</p>
<p>Bob Todd</p>
<p>Recommended by 266 people</p></blockquote>
<p>It worries me greatly that Bob does not appear to understand what racism actually is. The fact that 266 other morons apparently don&#8217;t either, and that said morons pushed this comment to the top of the pile, makes me despair.</p>
<p>Apparently this sort of thing is quite common. I hear people saying things like &#8220;I&#8217;m not a racist, but&#8230;&#8221; or &#8220;it&#8217;s just a laugh, they laugh along as well and make jokes about white people too.&#8221; As someone who has been a victim of racism I can assure you, dear reader, that these people are fucktards.</p>
<p>The picture of Mrs. Obama altered to look like an ape is racist because historically comparing black people to apes and implying that they are less highly evolved, less intelligent and less human than white people has been used by racists. Ridiculing people because of their actions or beliefs is fine, ridiculing them simply because of the colour of their skin (which they cannot do anything about) is racist. Calling someone a &#8220;paki&#8221; is racist because it is a term of abuse based on racial background, where as calling someone a &#8220;brit&#8221; is simply shorthand and not an insult. How people cannot understand this rather simple distinction is beyond me.</p>
<p>There has been criticism of attempts to educate kids about this kind of thing, calling it liberal leftist namby-pamby PC brigade nonsense, but clearly there is a very real need for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.world3.net/2009/11/halfwit-racists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BNP vs. BBC HYS forums &#8211; BNP loosing?</title>
		<link>http://blog.world3.net/2009/11/bnp-vs-bbc-hys-forums-bnp-loosing/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.world3.net/2009/11/bnp-vs-bbc-hys-forums-bnp-loosing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mojo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.world3.net/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the last few days posts mentioning the BNP seem to have dried up. While this is definitely a good thing, I wonder exactly why it is happening&#8230; I&#8217;d like to think that it&#8217;s the BBC taking notice of my complaints and doing something about them. However, I have a feeling that there may be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the last few days posts mentioning the BNP seem to have dried up. While this is definitely a good thing, I wonder exactly why it is happening&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to think that it&#8217;s the BBC taking notice of my complaints and doing something about them. However, I have a feeling that there may be a more sinister cause. Maybe the BNP shills have toned down their campaign a bit. After all, most of the top rated posts still consist of extreme right wing bullshit.</p>
<p>Even if the latter is the case, I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s still a positive development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.world3.net/2009/11/bnp-vs-bbc-hys-forums-bnp-loosing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Response from the BBC re: BNP hijacking of Have Your Say</title>
		<link>http://blog.world3.net/2009/11/response-from-the-bbc-re-bnp-hijacking-of-have-your-say/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.world3.net/2009/11/response-from-the-bbc-re-bnp-hijacking-of-have-your-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mojo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.world3.net/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got a response from my complaint to the BBC: Dear [MoJo] Thank you for your e-mail. I understand you&#8217;re unhappy with the &#8216;Have Your Say&#8217; messageboard as you feel it is being used by BNP and far right extremists to air their views and you feel this is inappropriate. If you disagree with a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a response from my complaint to the BBC:</p>
<blockquote><p>Dear [MoJo]</p>
<p>Thank you for your e-mail.</p>
<p>I understand you&#8217;re unhappy with the &#8216;Have Your Say&#8217; messageboard as you feel it is being used by BNP and far right extremists to air their views and you feel this is inappropriate.</p>
<p>If you disagree with a moderation decision please email Centralcommunitiesteam@bbc.co.uk. The Central Communities Team will then review &#8211; if an incorrect decision has been made you will be notified. Please note that while the Central Communities Team are happy to review the decisions made by the moderators, they will not enter into debate or discussion. Once a post has been reviewed, the Central Communities Team decision is final. Please do not send multiple emails, or additional/subsequent emails once you have received a response about a posting from the Central Communities Team.</p>
<p><strong>I appreciate that you feel with the current structure of the messageboard it is easy for groups, like BNP supporters, to rise up the recommended list and that something needs to be done about this so that the messageboard is more impartial and so I&#8217;ve registered your comment on our audience log. This is a daily report of audience feedback that&#8217;s circulated to many BBC staff, including members of the BBC Executive Board, channel controllers and other senior managers.</strong></p>
<p><strong>The audience logs are seen as important documents that can help shape decisions about future programming and content.</strong></p>
<p>Thanks again for taking the time to contact us.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Joe O&#8217;Brien<br />
BBC Complaints</p></blockquote>
<p>[Emphasis added by me]</p>
<p>Looks like they are at least aware of it, and hopefully will now do something about it. In the meantime setting up a counter-hijacking Facebook group is starting to look more and more attractive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.world3.net/2009/11/response-from-the-bbc-re-bnp-hijacking-of-have-your-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBC Have Your Say as a mouthpiece for the BNP</title>
		<link>http://blog.world3.net/2009/10/bbc-have-your-say-as-a-mouthpiece-for-the-bnp/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.world3.net/2009/10/bbc-have-your-say-as-a-mouthpiece-for-the-bnp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mojo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.world3.net/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If anyone were in any doubt that the BBC Have Your Say forum is being used by right-wing extremists like the BNP to push their views, today&#8217;s question about Binyam Mohamed should soon clear them up: Send him home!!!! [RulaBritannia], Bradford, United Kingdom and Yet again the system making me think its time to give [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone were in any doubt that the BBC Have Your Say forum is being used by right-wing extremists like the BNP to push their views, <a href="http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?sortBy=2&amp;forumID=7125&amp;edition=1&amp;ttl=20091017175857&amp;#paginator">today&#8217;s question about Binyam Mohamed</a> should soon clear them up:</p>
<blockquote><p>Send him home!!!!</p>
<p>[RulaBritannia], Bradford, United Kingdom</p></blockquote>
<p>and</p>
<blockquote><p>Yet again the system making me think its time to give the BNP a closer look.</p>
<p>Oh dear, York</p></blockquote>
<p>and</p>
<blockquote><p>DEPORT HIM!!!!</p>
<p>[cosmicKoalaK], London</p></blockquote>
<p>or</p>
<blockquote><p>Mr Binyam Mohamed should be sent back to Ethiopia ASAP.</p>
<p>Captain Mubbers, Britain out of EU!!</p></blockquote>
<p>The list goes on. The problem is that the highest rated comments only need about 180 odd votes to rise to the top. Finding 180 people to log in and vote is not hard for any determined organisation. In fact, part of me wants to start a Facebook group for that very purpose.</p>
<p>The BBC must do something about this. It cannot be platform for the BNP and other extremists. I would recommend a <a href="http://slashdot.org">Slashdot</a> style comments system, with the key ability to reply directly to other people&#8217;s posts and rate them based on more than just &#8220;I agree&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.world3.net/2009/10/bbc-have-your-say-as-a-mouthpiece-for-the-bnp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Living the lie</title>
		<link>http://blog.world3.net/2009/10/living-the-lie/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.world3.net/2009/10/living-the-lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mojo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.world3.net/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The biggest lie of the modern age is the American Dream(TM), also known as Thatcherism in the UK. The pitch is that anyone can make it if they work hard. Wealth comes to those who earn it, who do it for themselves. Actually, most people will never be rich. Most of us spend our entire [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>The biggest lie of the modern age is the American Dream(TM), also known as Thatcherism in the UK.</p>
<p>The pitch is that anyone can make it if they work hard. Wealth comes to those who earn it, who do it for themselves.</p>
<p>Actually, most people will never be rich. Most of us spend our entire lives working for other people, earning a salary that tends to fit to a scale set out early on by our choice of career and qualifications.</p>
<p>The sooner you accept this and start trying to make the most of where you are now without chasing dreams of wealth, the sooner you can be happy. Your life is not validated by the amount of money you have, it&#8217;s validated by the way you live it.</span></p>
<p><span>At least, that&#8217;s what I tell myself.<br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.world3.net/2009/10/living-the-lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More BNP nonsense on BBC Have Your Say</title>
		<link>http://blog.world3.net/2009/08/more-bnp-nonsense-on-bbc-have-your-say/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.world3.net/2009/08/more-bnp-nonsense-on-bbc-have-your-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mojo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.world3.net/?p=168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that the BNP has been making a big effort lately to push their views via the BBC Have Your Say forums. It&#8217;s not surprising really, as the forums get millions of page views but you only need ~150 votes for your comment to rise to the top, something any interested group with more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that the BNP has been making a big effort lately to push their views via the <a href="http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?sortBy=2&amp;forumID=6831&amp;edition=1&amp;ttl=20090803181737&amp;#paginator">BBC Have Your Say forums</a>. It&#8217;s not surprising really, as the forums get millions of page views but you only need ~150 votes for your comment to rise to the top, something any interested group with more than a few hundred members could organise. Come to that, it could just be a single person with lots of accounts and an automated script.</p>
<p>Anyway, time to refute some of the bullshit:</p>
<blockquote><p>We don&#8217;t need &#8220;tougher&#8221; citizenship tests, we need tougher border control&#8230;</p>
<p>We have over 2 million unemployed, why on earth would we need ANY immigrants??</p>
<p>We should :-<br />
1) Remove all illegal immigrants without hesitation.</p>
<p>2) Change the definition of Asylum to mean providing a place or safety for as long as it is deemed to be required &#8211; NO right to citizenship, ever..</p>
<p>3) If we have a skills shortage, train our own people first&#8230;</p>
<p>We are a small island, we need to limit our population..</p>
<p><strong>Slightly Right Of Ghenghis Khan</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Why should we need more people when we have unemployed? This is the often touted &#8220;we should have 100% employment&#8221; argument. It ignores the fact that you are never going to match every person to a suitable job, based on the skills required and a reasonable salary for them to live and look after their family on. It also ignores the fact that if you force people to do shitty, demeaning jobs with no prospects it tends to lead to things like depression (and time of work), as well as driving them to a life of crime. You can&#8217;t really have the media, particularly adverts, telling people that they need stuff and should aspire to things on the one hand, and on the other hand tell them they are worthless and should accept their lowly lot in life and bloody well like it.</p>
<p>So, on to point (1). If we knew where illegal immigrants where, we could remove them. Unfortunately, we don&#8217;t, and it&#8217;s not exactly easy to find out. Plus, it takes years, even in the simplest cases, to decide asylum cases. If you think it&#8217;s easy to figure out who is genuine and who isn&#8217;t, you need to give Asylum and Immigration a call immediately.</p>
<p>As for (2), you are pretty much guaranteeing that asylum seekers spend their life on benefits, scrounging off the rest of us hard-working Brits if you don&#8217;t allow them citizenship. After all, non-citizens cannot easily get a job (in fact, by default there is not even a right to work for asylum seekers). It wouldn&#8217;t stop them using public services either, such as being housed (for free, since they can&#8217;t work) or getting treatment on the NHS. I suppose we could just kick them into the gutter and let them die quietly, but that goes against my liberal wishy-washy-politically-correct-namby-pamby feelings of compassion towards my fellow human beings.</p>
<p>So, back to the first point again with item (3). Unfortunately, it takes many years to train people to do complicated jobs. Also, people don&#8217;t tend to do too well at leaning things they have absolutely no interest in. You can&#8217;t just mould people like clay into any shape you want.</p>
<p>I was just saying today how the popularity of Harry Potter gives me some hope that children are still interested in reading, but now I realise that Harry Potter may just be a gateway text for the Daily Mail. Maybe we should ban reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.world3.net/2009/08/more-bnp-nonsense-on-bbc-have-your-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
