<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparison of PDF viewers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.world3.net/2009/09/comparison-of-pdf-viewers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.world3.net/2009/09/comparison-of-pdf-viewers/</link>
	<description>たとえ溺れても梦はゆめでしかない</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:15:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mojo</title>
		<link>http://blog.world3.net/2009/09/comparison-of-pdf-viewers/comment-page-1/#comment-12219</link>
		<dc:creator>mojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 11:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.world3.net/?p=198#comment-12219</guid>
		<description>I use Sumatra now. It has been steadily improving and now produces excellent and faster rendering. I was using the x64 build but it is no longer maintained by the looks of it so I went back to x86.

The bars above RESET and SS are supposed to be there, they represent the fact that the signal is active low rather than active high. Sumatra renders them properly now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Sumatra now. It has been steadily improving and now produces excellent and faster rendering. I was using the x64 build but it is no longer maintained by the looks of it so I went back to x86.</p>
<p>The bars above RESET and SS are supposed to be there, they represent the fact that the signal is active low rather than active high. Sumatra renders them properly now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fuujuhi</title>
		<link>http://blog.world3.net/2009/09/comparison-of-pdf-viewers/comment-page-1/#comment-12216</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuujuhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 09:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.world3.net/?p=198#comment-12216</guid>
		<description>Hello,

I went exactly the same way as you. Escape from the bloatware and security-hole Adobe Acrobat Reader to try FoxIt PDF. I appreciated the annotation capability, but the text quality was much too bad.

Finally I settled with PDF XChange Viewer. To my opinion it&#039;s simply the best, too bad it&#039;s not available on Linux. Annotation is much better, and rendering quality is &quot;almost&quot; on par with Adobe.

What reader are you using now?

Also, did you noticed that FoxIt added lines on top of &quot;RESET&quot; and &quot;SS&quot;, but not others? Is that a bug in the other readers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I went exactly the same way as you. Escape from the bloatware and security-hole Adobe Acrobat Reader to try FoxIt PDF. I appreciated the annotation capability, but the text quality was much too bad.</p>
<p>Finally I settled with PDF XChange Viewer. To my opinion it&#8217;s simply the best, too bad it&#8217;s not available on Linux. Annotation is much better, and rendering quality is &#8220;almost&#8221; on par with Adobe.</p>
<p>What reader are you using now?</p>
<p>Also, did you noticed that FoxIt added lines on top of &#8220;RESET&#8221; and &#8220;SS&#8221;, but not others? Is that a bug in the other readers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mojo</title>
		<link>http://blog.world3.net/2009/09/comparison-of-pdf-viewers/comment-page-1/#comment-3827</link>
		<dc:creator>mojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.world3.net/?p=198#comment-3827</guid>
		<description>Thanks, I&#039;ll look at Evince.

No PDF reader seems to be quite as good as Adobe&#039;s for rendering quality, and even that isn&#039;t quite as good as Windows when it comes to fonts.

Windows with Cleartype is one of the few renderers which is designed to be readable on screen at the expense of accuracy. Fonts don&#039;t look quite how they do in print on screen, but they are easier to read on an LCD.

I suppose the whole point of PDF is to display a document exactly as it prints, but some lack of accuracy in exchange for extra on-screen readability is a reasonable compromise in my eyes (no pun intended).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I&#8217;ll look at Evince.</p>
<p>No PDF reader seems to be quite as good as Adobe&#8217;s for rendering quality, and even that isn&#8217;t quite as good as Windows when it comes to fonts.</p>
<p>Windows with Cleartype is one of the few renderers which is designed to be readable on screen at the expense of accuracy. Fonts don&#8217;t look quite how they do in print on screen, but they are easier to read on an LCD.</p>
<p>I suppose the whole point of PDF is to display a document exactly as it prints, but some lack of accuracy in exchange for extra on-screen readability is a reasonable compromise in my eyes (no pun intended).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biob</title>
		<link>http://blog.world3.net/2009/09/comparison-of-pdf-viewers/comment-page-1/#comment-3808</link>
		<dc:creator>biob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.world3.net/?p=198#comment-3808</guid>
		<description>Foxit PDF, is a just unbeatable as an alternative, if you dont have sensitive bees-eyes. I dont notice the font differneces, but you really cant beat the PDF mode- to plaintext mode. multiple tabbing, highlight, and various scroll. I like it. Although, I have never used Sumatra, but it looks too plain. I think Evince on Gnome which is a bit minimalistic seems like it could be more featureful than Sumatra. Also, Evince has a Windows release now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Foxit PDF, is a just unbeatable as an alternative, if you dont have sensitive bees-eyes. I dont notice the font differneces, but you really cant beat the PDF mode- to plaintext mode. multiple tabbing, highlight, and various scroll. I like it. Although, I have never used Sumatra, but it looks too plain. I think Evince on Gnome which is a bit minimalistic seems like it could be more featureful than Sumatra. Also, Evince has a Windows release now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

